RE:defining experience

Why I wrote this

version:
1.0.0

I have spent twenty-five years watching organisations try to deliver experiences that matter to their audiences. I have seen them investing seriously, working hard, and still falling short of what they wanted and had committed to deliver. I have seen what works and what does not. That is what has led me to develop the Experience Ecosystem FrameworkTM (XEF).

I had to ask myself whether the world really needs yet another framework, and the answer is yes. I believe that:

  • Better experiences benefit everyone. They benefit the people and organisations that buy from, work for, work with, and are affected by them. They also benefit the organisations themselves: in the talent they attract, the trust they earn, the loyalty they build, and the long-term resilience they accumulate.
  • Experience management is broken. It is fragmented, inefficient, and not delivering the value it should. Each experience discipline optimises for its own definition of success, leaving the connections between them unmanaged. And increasing external pressures are constantly widening the gap between what an organisation commits to delivering vs what its audiences actually experience.
  • Experience must be managed as a whole. To be truly effective an experience framework must cover every audience an organisation impacts, align the entire organisation to a common standard, and be open for anyone to apply, in any kind of organisation. No existing approach does all three.

That is what XEF sets out to do. It is a whole-organisation framework for managing experience across every audience, designed, delivered, and measured to a single defined standard. It was built to apply across industries, sectors, and sizes of organisation, anywhere in the world. It does not depend on an organisation's technology, culture, or structure, and it can be learned and applied by an organisation's own people rather than bought in.

This is a betabook, by which I mean a combination of a blog, thought leadership, and a book: the structure and depth of a book, the argued point of view of thought leadership, and the update cadence of a blog. It wasn't written to be published once and updated every few years. It is continually revised to keep pace with an experience landscape that does not stand still. When the evidence moves, a source is superseded, or a better example emerges, the betabook changes.

XEF and this betabook began from a single viewpoint, built on decades of research and practice, but the framework will keep evolving through the input of a global community of experience specialists and enthusiasts. That is the other reason the world can bear another framework: this one is built not to go out of date.

This betabook is based on my personal experiences and observations, and how I think experience should be managed going forward. It also draws on the work of thought leaders from many different fields who have made significant contributions to how experience as a discipline has developed. What follows is the case for why experience needs to be approached differently, the framework that does it, and the evidence from organisations that have shown what becomes possible when they manage experience well.

Much of the commercial research cited was produced by firms with a stake in the conclusion, and most of it establishes correlation rather than cause. What makes it credible is that the independent academic literature, which has no such stake, keeps finding the same relationships. Where the two point the same way, I have used both, and said which is which. AI was part of the process throughout, for research, checking sources, and pressure-testing arguments. However, the ideas, perspectives, and judgements are mine.

As XEF is new, no organisation has yet applied it in full. The case studies in Chapter 9 are not examples of the framework in action. They are organisations that have done one dimension of it exceptionally well, or failed at one badly, and what they demonstrate is what is at stake in each. The framework is an argument about how the parts fit together, built on years of observation of which parts stand firm and which give way. I'm looking forward to updating the thinking and the examples as organisations adopt a whole-organisation approach to experience.

As we move further into an AI-powered future, I believe organisations that are experience-led will hold a distinct competitive advantage. I also believe that becoming an experience specialist offers a career advantage for those who choose to pursue it. This betabook is for those who are passionate about and value good experience. I hope it is useful, and that it makes the work you are doing easier to explain, easier to fund, and easier to build. And I hope it transforms a discipline that deserves the architecture to deliver better experiences that benefit everyone.

Amy

© 2026 Amy Pirie. All rights reserved.
RE:defining experience and the Experience Ecosystem FrameworkTM (XEF) are the intellectual property of Amy Pirie. You are welcome to read, quote and share this material with attribution, and to apply the framework in your own organisation or client work. You may not repackage it, build derivative frameworks or tools from it, or sell it.
Full Terms of Use.

Share your thoughts

Be part of redefining experience and share your thoughts below.
(required)
(required)
(required)
Thank you! Your message has been received and we'll be in touch soon.
Uh oh! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please email us at hello@xefglobal.com

Subscribe for updates

Experience doesn't stand still so neither does this betabook. Enter your email to follow the evolution.
Unsubscribe any time. Read our Privacy Policy for how we process your information.